Advertisement
MCP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Glossary
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peng, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Xia, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peng, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Xia, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Submitted on February 2, 2009
Revised on August 26, 2009
Accepted on September 3, 2009

A proteomic study of the response to salinity and drought stress in an introgression strain of bread wheat

Zhenying Peng, Mengcheng Wang, Fei Li, Hongjun Lv, Cuiling Li, and Guangmin Xia

School of Life Science, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250100

Corresponding Author: xiagm{at}sdu.edu.cn

The effect of drought and salinity stress on the seedlings of the somatic hybrid wheat cv. Shanrong No. 3 (SR3) and its parent bread wheat cv. Jinan 177 (JN177) was investigated using two dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Out of a set of 93 (root) and 65 (leaf) differentially expressed proteins (DEPs), 34 (root) and six (leaf) DEPs were cultivar-specific. The remaining DEPs were salinity/drought stress responsive, but not cultivar-specific. Many of the DEPs were expressed under both drought and salinity stress. The amounts of stress responsive DEPs between SR3 and JN177 were almost equivalent, whereas only some of these DEPs were shared by two cultivars. Overall, the number of salinity responsive DEPs was greater than the number of drought responsive ones. And most of the drought responsive DEPs also responded to salinity. There are both similarities and differences in the response of wheat to salinity and drought. A parallel transcriptomic analysis showed that the correlation between transcriptional and translational patterns of DEPs was poor. The enhanced drought/salinity tolerance of SR3 appears to be governed by a superior capacity for osmotic and ionic homeostasis, a more efficient removal of toxic by products, and ultimately a better potential for growth recovery.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement